Nothing is harder to see than things we believe so deeply we don't even
see them. This is certainly true in the "security space," in which our
narratives are self-referential, bounded by mutual self-interest, and
characterized by a heavy dose of group-think. That narrative serves as
insulation to filter out the most critical truths we know about our
work.
An analysis of deeper political and economic structures reveals the usual statements made in the "security space" in a new context, one which illuminates our mixed motivations and the interpenetration of over worlds and underworlds in our global society. Crime and legitimacy, that is, are the yin/yang of society, security, and our lives. You can't have one without the other. And nobody should know this better than hackers.
An analysis of deeper political and economic structures reveals the usual statements made in the "security space" in a new context, one which illuminates our mixed motivations and the interpenetration of over worlds and underworlds in our global society. Crime and legitimacy, that is, are the yin/yang of society, security, and our lives. You can't have one without the other. And nobody should know this better than hackers.
What's your take on it ?
No comments:
Post a Comment